|
DARK MATTER
So what is dark matter? Or to be more precise cold dark matter. This is a term coined originally through translation from Henri Poincare's reference to "matiere obscure" to explain the observation of certain areas of our universe where the understood laws of physics seem to be defied. In particular in the motions of certain galaxies. The speed of the outside of the galaxy is moving faster than the inside because it needs to travel a further distance to complete one revolution. The speed of those galaxies in a way is a conservation of angular momentum from the original spinning eddies of hot electrons and quarks that cooled to form each galaxy’s original atoms. What keeps the outer arms together at the speeds they are rotating at when our current understanding of gravity claims they should be ejected from their orbits at those speeds is one observation that points to an unseen gravitational attraction. So that could be unseen particles of matter with gravitational attraction or it can also mean our understanding of gravity is incomplete OR it can mean both ! Another observation of dark matter is associated with gravitational lensing where the gravitational bending of light points to a greater gravitational attraction than the calculated mass of the system. Movements inside the Bullet Cluster and red shift distortions are further evidence of either particles smaller than our current elementary particles and currently unmeasurable or our understanding of gravity is incomplete or both. So without arguing against any core requirements of QFT, QED, or QCD, we can have discreet measurable quanta of energy tied to specific possible wavelengths and still someday find out there are particles smaller than our current elementary particles. If there is an infinite succession of hierarchical frames of reference going outwards then there is also an infinite succession of frames of reference going inwards. There is no smallest particle of matter or smallest charge of energy or smallest distance of length or span of time or lumen of luminosity or degree of temperature. Plank provided the smallest working units to circumvent the ultraviolet catastrophe but inside every cohesive frame of reference are component units that as a whole aggregate their properties. As we go below plank length to see what makes up the particles that makes up the particles that makes up neutrino’s I predict someday we will find that random chaos brings order. At specific scales of mass energy time density we see matter take on certain properties. We see at a certain scale a periodic table and at another scale the table of our standard model. I predict as we go deeper and smaller we will find recurring instances where particles at that scale factor of mass energy density in relation to relative time will take on properties that define their interactions at each stage. The basic laws of physics, classical mechanics, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism work at all scale factors. But relativity helps define how it all structures. As we go smaller and smaller what we find is that the objects relative to us are moving through less space or moving slower through our space. Objects that move fast through space move slow through time so objects moving slow through space move fast through time. That combined with an increasing aggregate velocity of each subsequent reference frame causes matter moving fast to behave more like energy and energy from fast moving matter in turn causes electromagnetic fields and indirectly gravity. I will touch on this more when we review the properties of the quantum foam. But for now I feel science in general agrees that whatever observations they see that do not make sense and can’t be explained once we confirm unequivocally that we fully understand gravity, the remaining attraction could be from subneutrino size matter moving very fast and potentially hundreds or even thousands of them making up each neutrino. There could be a sea of particles in the 10^-34 , 10^-32, and 10^-30 scales that could go undetected by the instruments we are using today. But that alone may not be what is associated with the unknown gravitational anomalies that don’t make sense and I touch on this part in much more detail when we talk about gravity but I theorize that our understanding of classical gravity is incomplete. We use a constant to express gravity and this works well in most cases but it’s not how it really works. Instead gravity requires a function not a constant because gravity takes on aggregate strength when there are additional objects between two each objects. The laws of gravity for many body systems needs to better handle the aggregate nature of gravity. If we had two moons ejected from their systems and galaxies and found floating around in Bootes void close to the center of the void there might be very little external gravitational attraction occurring and the only forces on each object would be each other. That is then a good example of when Newton’s gravitational constant would apply directly. But now let’s put another moon in between them. So we still have the force of the two original moons pulling on each other but now you also have the new moon in the middle pulling on each of the other two so we now have a greater aggregate force between the original two moons but the moon in the center is being pulled at by the original moons and they produced a slightly greater attraction then just the amount added by the third moon. Add another moon in between and the total attractive force felt by the two outside moons will be greater than the sum of the individual attractions. I have referenced this elsewhere sometimes as Aetheric density but not directly meant to refer to the Aether but instead all matter itself. There is no single particle that is a graviton, every particle is a graviton and the higher the mass energy density the greater the gravitational attraction as well as the greater the ability to pass on the gravitational attraction of other objects. So the function for gravity might need far more parameters than a human could ever handle for most cosmology but future quantum computers might be up to the task. Each object having its spheres of influences and spherical waves of gravitational attraction causing millions of different intersections of the associated spheres of influences and every point of intersection being part of the equation. Most definitely something where integrals and trig are going to be proven to produce more accurate descriptions for how gravity behaves in many body systems. And then we might find how mass energy density defines aggregate gravitational attraction and see how dense matter inside atomic nuclei manifests as the strong force using the same type of function instead of a constant. There is work already done related to what is known as the 'Double Copy' that is able to associate a quantum representation gravity being tied to the strong nuclear force. So we may be close to having an electroweek and gravistrong pair of forces and its just a matter of time until its all defined as different flavors of electromagnetic radiation. Another way to think about this might be to think about the double slit experiment. Those interference patterns show how waves that align in phase produce greater intensity. Gravitational waves would have the same things going on and there would be an immeasurable number of these intersecting waves of gravity that would be sharing a single frame of reference so their gravitational waves could easily be more in phase and produce stronger aggregate gravitational waves with higher intensity. We can see how we aggregate led light sources to produce more electromagnetic radiation and higher lumens. We can see how we can combine magnets to make a stronger magnetic force. It would make sense that more objects giving off a gravitational attraction would created a higher intensity attraction. And we know that mechanical waves that increase their amplitude produce more energy at a rate of the increase in amplitude squared. So if gravitational wave in phase produce stronger amplitudes they carry more energy because the increase in energy carried is squared. Another reason I am certain that aggregate gravity or Aetheric Density will be shown to explain a large amount of what we needed dark matter to explain. So in my eyes I feel someday it will be confirmed that the Lambda CDM model will be transformed into something with less dark energy and dark matter and more explainable forces due to a better understanding of gravity as well as a sea of quantum foam that holds everything together. For that is the natural state of nature. Recent research indicates that dark matter is more evenly distributed than most predictions estimated. Let me be clear that the quantum foam may not be the same as dark matter. The foam could be a very small fraction of the dark matter. The foam could be trillions of times smaller than dark matter. Dark matter could exist at scales far below neutrinos yet still far above the size of the foam. #darkmatter #ElementaryParticles #Gravity #Aether #aethericdensity #aggregategravity # (added 1/10/22) If my predictions of how gravity works were true then areas of less density where there is less force carriers for gravity it would behave more like we predict gravity should and would appear to have little to no dark matter. And again another prediction is found to be true : Galaxies Without Matter
#thenaturalstateofnature
All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.
|